California legislators promote stopping violation of athletes’ rights

Legislators of California affirm that anti-doping agencies violate fundamental constitutional rights of sportspersons suspected of doping. Thus, sportspersons that have never tested positive for any banned medications are pursued. That’s why the legislators asked Congress to review this issue.
It is known that the USADA is sponsored mainly by taxpayers. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) gives 10 million dollars each year. This governmental office promotes fighting against administration of banned drugs. Its goal is to uproot illicit manufacture and drug use, crimes linked with application of illegal drugs, etc.
The request of California legislators was initiated soon after the celebrated cyclist Lance Armstrong decided not to appeal his lifetime ban from professional sports.
Everybody knows that Lance Armstrong has forfeited his 7 titles obtained at Tour de France. He was also suspended from competitions entirely.
Summer Lance Armstrong filed a lawsuit against the USADA, claiming that his constitutional rights were violated. But the judge Sam Sparks refused to accept the lawsuit. He claimed that the USADA acted appropriately. The judge also noticed that the USADA was established in order to clean sports from those that use banned preparations.
California Senator Michael Rubio confirmed that Sam Sparks didn’t act appropriately, refusing to accept the lawsuit against the USADA. Thus, the senators confirmed that the USADA violated rights of some sportspersons. That’s why they initiated the request to Congress.

Barry Bonds says what he thinks about Lance Armstrong

Barry Bonds knows what a sportsperson experiences, if he/she is targeted by feds and anti-doping officials. He understands what this individual feels. That’s why the former professional baseball player can sympathize and support sportspersons suspected of doping. So, Barry Bonds supports Lance Armstrong, the seven-time Tour de France winner.
During an interview a journalist asked Barry Bonds about problems of Lance Armstrong related to doping suspicions. The former baseball player showed his admiration towards the seven-time Tour de France winner. He confirmed that Lance Armstrong was the most brilliant cyclist that has ever been in the sport of cycling.
Of course, Barry Bonds knows what he says. He understands what it means to be a good cyclist. After he retired from baseball, he became a cyclist. He participated in some competitions successfully. Being a cyclist, he sees that this sport has the same troubles like baseball. He comprehends that cyclists are targeted by federal prosecutors and anti-doping officials like professional baseball players.
Both Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds were suspected of doping. They were investigated by feds and anti-doping officials.
Federal prosecutors accused Barry Bonds of lying about usage of banned products and obstruction of justice. They couldn’t prove that the sportsperson lied about administration of forbidden medicines. But feds affirmed that he was guilty of obstructing justice. The former baseball player decided to appeal the decision of the court.
When it comes to Lance Armstrong, the government dropped the case against him. But the USADA continued to target the cyclist. The USADA affirmed that Lance Armstrong had been administering prohibited medications throughout his cycling career. The cyclist decided to stop fighting against accusations of the anti-doping agency. He lost his Tour de France titles and money he had received at these events.
Although Lance Armstrong forfeited his titles, Americans continue to respect him. They claim that he is the most splendid cyclist of all times. Lance Armstrong’s sponsors haven’t stopped to support his cancer charity. The seven-time Tour de France winner helps people to fight against cancer. So, many individuals are thankful. They will always remember what Lance Armstrong has done for them.
Barry Bonds’ reputation has been spoiled by suspicions related to application of prohibited preparations. The former baseball player hopes that his achievements during the baseball career are more significant than the accusations. He believes that people will forget about the accusations and he will be considered to be a baseball star.

Nadezya Ostapchuk’s coach put banned substance into her food

The Belarusian shot putter Nadezya Ostapchuk received the gold medal at the 2012 Summer Olympics. But she failed a drug test. As a result, she lost the medal that was given to Valeria Adams of New Zealand.
Two tests indicated presence of a steroid’s metabolites in her urine samples.
If an athlete is caught taking any banned medicines, he/she is commonly sentenced to a ban of two years. As for this Belarusian shot putter, she received one-year suspension. Why was the sentence lighter? There were certain circumstances which proved the following condition: the shop putter didn’t administer any prohibited product intentionally.
At the beginning the Belarusian shot putter blamed his former coach. She confirmed that he had sabotaged her sample.
The Belarusian National Anti-Doping Agency examined this case. The International Association of Athletic Federation also took part in the investigation. It was found out that Yefimov was guilty. This person added powder of methenolone into food of Nadezya Ostapchuk during the last week before the 2012 Olympic Games. The coach reported that he had worried about Nadezya Ostapchuk. He believed that this steroid would help to win.
In fact, it is difficult to define why Yefimov has done it. He just made the things worse.
Anti-doping officers accepted these statements. That’s why Nadezya Ostapchuk was sentenced just to one-year suspension.
As for supporters of Valeria Adams, they didn’t believe that Nadezya Ostapchuk had not administered the steroid knowingly. They confirmed that Yefimov just tried to protect the shot putter. They said that Nadezya Ostapchuk had taken steroids under recommendations of her coach.
If Nadezya Ostapchuk’s performance was amazing some months before the 2012 Olympics, her coach had to be sure that she would win. Why did he worry about her performance?

Feds interview former girlfriends of some athletes

Several sportspersons who are suspected of steroid use become targets of the government. Federal prosecutors do almost everything in order to learn whether some athletes have applied any doping products. They don’t spare taxpayers’ funds for this purpose. Much money is spent to disclose even private life of athletes. According to the government, some details of their private behavior can disclose the truth about intake of forbidden medications. Thus, girlfriends of some sportspersons are interviewed by federal prosecutors.
For example, it has been reported that former girlfriends of Lance Armstrong and Roger Clemens and a former mistress of Barry Bonds have been asked about some aspects related to private life of these athletes. Which questions were asked?
Kimberly Bell, a former mistress of Barry Bonds, was asked about size of testicles of this athlete. She reported that the baseball player’s testicles were shrunken. Thus, her answer served as a proof that Barry Bonds administered steroids and/or other prohibited medicines.
It is known that shrinkage of testicles is included in undesirable results of some steroids. Thus, the government decided to find out whether Barry Bonds had had this problem. But it is an unreliable argument in order to prove that someone has taken some prohibited substances. Consumers of steroids may prevent this adverse consequence, if they administer several medications for this purpose.
Mindy McCready, a former mistress of Roger Clemens, was asked whether this former baseball player had experienced erectile dysfunctions. The singer affirmed that sometimes Roger Clemens had suffered from this problem.
When it comes to erectile dysfunctions, they may occur during usage of steroids. But if you study information about adverse effects of steroids more attentively, you can understand that this problem is more likely to appear after discontinuation of application. It happens because natural secretion of testosterone is usually suppressed by administration of exogenous testosterone. But since there are such medications that have capacity to regenerate natural testosterone secretion, erectile dysfunctions can be prevented.
Sheryl Crow, a former girlfriend of Lance Armstrong, was also targeted by the government. But it is not known what she was asked about. According to certain suggestions, she might have been asked also about sexuality of the cyclist.
In fact, federal prosecutors have a wrong point of view in this case. However testicular atrophy and erectile dysfunctions may occur on account of steroid use, these arguments are not proper.

Many people express thanks for Don Hooton’s presentations

Some medications are called “performance-enhancing drugs”. What do these medications represent? Why have been they called “performance-enhancing”? Various individuals may present different definitions. Let mention what a teenager says! Before presenting her point of view it is necessary to mention that her brother, Taylor Hooton, experienced serious depression after usage of steroids. Ultimately, he committed suicide. He desired to look like Melky Cabrera, Barry Bonds and other famous sportspersons that have administered steroids. But his death came suddenly. His sister believes that performance-enhancing drugs are dangerous products. They are named “performance-enhancing drugs” in order to lure young individuals that want to improve their appearances and performances.
Don Hooton, Taylor’s father, formed a foundation to teach youth about dangers related to steroids. He describes which dangers are associated with administration of anabolic steroids and other related medicines. He also uses slideshow presentations in order to explain that these products may cause such negative effects, as diabetes, heart diseases, liver disorders, etc.
Don Hooton tries to educate young individuals about serious risks related to application of steroids. But he realizes that it is difficult. He claims that a lot of young persons take doping medications. When their friends see that they become stronger and more muscular, they desire to be like them. They follow their examples in order to improve appearance and have more strength.
Unfortunately, several parents think that their children are free from steroid use. Some of them think that their daughters don’t take steroids because these medications are indicated to add muscles and body weight in general. But according to certain sources, girls also apply steroids. They take these products in order to lose fat. Some parents don’t know that anabolic steroids are also applied to reduce fat deposits. That’s why adults also should be taught about effects of steroids. Furthermore, several parents think that their children don’t administer steroids because these drugs are expensive. But it is enough to have 20-500 dollars in order to buy steroids for a cycle.
It is stated that every16th high school student applies steroids. But this point of view is mistaken. Each 16th high school student admits to administering performance-enhancing drugs.   But numerous persons hide that they use these products.
Those who listen to Don Hooton’s explanations about steroids express their thanks. They are thankful that they may get knowledge about these preparations.

Hypocrisy reigns, steroids are blamed in our fake world

Anyone knows that anabolic steroids are often demonized. If a sportsperson or a bodybuilder uses steroids and/or other doping products, he/she is considered to be a cheater. Sportswriters report about such individuals as about those who have destructed their reputation. Anti-doping officials put incredible efforts and spend money in other to determine whether certain athletes have doped. Even the government spends taxpayers’ funds and time in order to prove that several athletes have applied steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. It is affirmed that those who dope take unfair advantages in sports.
Many pieces of news describe the fight against steroids. But let think whether arguments against intake of steroids are strong enough to prove that it is disgraceful to use them.
It is confirmed that steroid-using sportspersons serve as a bad example for kids and young persons. It is known that youth sees numerous sports stars that use steroids and other related remedies. As a result, young people want to look and be as strong, as these famous sports figures.  Moreover, it is widely discussed about health risks linked with steroids. But if you are attentive, you can comprehend that these arguments are weak because hypocrisy reigns here.
Let examine the most spread arguments against usage of anabolic steroids and/or other related products.
According to the first argument, intake of steroids is closely associated with several probable health risks. Many articles warn about shrinkage of testicles and enlargement of heart that may occur on account of steroid use. Although it may be true, let analyze our life. We consume unhealthy food, however we know that it destroys our health. Several persons administer antidepressants which are also quite unsafe. We are also involved in other unhealthy activities.
According to another argument against steroids, steroid-using sportspersons take unfair advantages in competitions. They win because they increase performance with these preparations. Let see what happens in other areas, for example, in the world of entertainment.  A lot of actors and actresses improve their appearances and performances in order to play several roles in movies. They also take unfair advantages over others with the help of some surgeries and other things. But they are not sentenced to suspensions.
While it is confirmed that steroid-using sportspeople send bad messages to young persons that want to look like them and follow their examples, nobody notes about the bad example of actors and actresses. Young girls also want to look like those they see in magazines.
While federal prosecutors pursue sportspeople who use steroids, they have nothing to do with actors and actresses who act the same way.
It is clear that arguments against application of steroids are very weak. They show hypocrisy that reigns in our counterfeit world.

It is strange that Belarusian shot putter has tested positive for metenolone

The Belarusian shot putter Nadzeya Ostapchuk won the 2012 Olympic gold medal. But she lost the medal because she was caught using the anabolic steroid metenolone (methenolone). She was asked to provide two samples. The substance metenolone was found in both urine samples.
If you read news linked with doping, you must know that professional sportspeople and bodybuilders are usually caught using other steroids and/or doping products. But when it comes to Nadzeya Ostapchuk, she tested positive for metenolone. It is unusual, according to statements of anti-doping officers. What does this forbidden medication represent? Why don’t athletes ordinarily take this product for enhancement of performance?
Metenolone is an anabolic steroid. It has weak androgenic properties. It acts like testosterone, enhancing muscle mass and adding energy.
However this steroid has only mild androgenic nature, it causes development of sex male characteristics in females. Females who use this medication may face typical virilizing effects: the voice becomes deeper; hair grows on the face and on other parts of the body; etc.
This anabolic steroid may be administered orally or through injections.
Metenolone (Methenolone) produces amazing effects, when it is administered by sportspersons during their workouts. It is not taken during competitions. It doesn’t work, if it is used just on the day of a competition.
It is also confirmed that it is easy to catch those that apply this steroid.
Undesirable results of Metenolone (Methenolone) depend on measures that are applied. They are following: water retention, elevated calcium level in the blood, bone growth, hirsutism, acne, hair loss, menstrual abnormalities, increased sex drive, etc.
Thus, when you see a female athlete who has deep voice and excessive hair growth on the body, you may accuse her of doping. Actually, it is wrong because these troubles may appear also in those women that don’t administer any steroids. But sometimes these effects demonstrate that certain women apply medicines which have androgenic properties.

Australian physician Peter Grant induced selling anabolic steroids

Some physician abuse their position, prescribing drugs which don’t meet criteria of therapeutic needs of patients. Why does it happen? It is known that some medications are claimed to be prescription medications. It means that you can’t obtain them legally, if you don’t have any prescription from your treating physician. Anabolic steroids belong to such preparations. It is illegal to purchase steroids without a prescription in some countries. Those that do it may be punished. They may be enforced to pay a fine and/or go to prison. Of course, numerous individuals seek ways to get and apply these preparations without having legal troubles.
Anabolic steroids are often abused. A lot of sportspersons and bodybuilders apply these products not for therapeutic purposes but for performance-enhancing effects. If they live in countries where these preparations can’t be obtained legally without prescriptions, they find certain ways to mask their illicit purchase and administration. Sportspeople, bodybuilders and even ordinary people ask their health care providers to prescribe them these drugs, as if they had therapeutic needs to use them. So, some health care providers promote selling anabolic steroids to those that abuse them. Here is a case.
Peter Grant, an Australian physician, prescribed steroids to 14 patients during nine years. Medical state of these patients didn’t require administration of these medications. Thus, the doctor was accused of improper practicing medicine. For example, he prescribed to a patient taking such medications, as Halotestin, Sustanon, Andriol Testocaps, Deca Durabolin, Scitropin and Proviron. But there was no any medical basis to prescribe these drugs to this man. Furthermore, these medicines were recommended him during 9 years.
The health care provider Peter Grant acknowledged that several patients were competing. So, he prescribed them steroids. He also admitted to studying scientific information about anabolic steroids. He claimed that he knew how steroids acted. Thus, he supervised the patients who used anabolic steroids.
Taking these aspects in consideration, it is possible to affirm that the health care provider Peter Grant was better known by those who applied steroids for increase of performance than by those that had to be cured from certain health problems. Peter Grant affirmed that he knew that steroids were purchased by his patients just for personal intake.
When the physician appeared in the court, the judge claimed that the doctor promoted selling steroids. The judge noticed that Peter Grant had to be punished appropriately. Peter Grant was suspended from practicing medicine for 12 months. Moreover, the judge stated that he would be disciplined during the next 2 years.

Federal prosecutors intended to question Sheryl Crow as part of investigation linked with Lance Armstrong

The American professional cyclist Lance Armstrong was accused of doping. It was suspected that the athlete had administered EPO and other prohibited drugs.
Many individuals provided their testimonies in the court during the investigation connected with Lance Armstrong’s case. A former girlfriend of the sportsperson was also targeted. She was scheduled to appear in the court. Certain sports writers claimed that the musician Sheryl Crow had been interviewed by federal prosecutors.
The athlete Lance Armstrong and the musician Sheryl Crow were claimed to be one of the most famous couples. They spent a lot of time together. Sheryl Crow lived with the seven-time winner of Tour de France in Spain. The musician travelled with Lance Armstrong during his workouts. They were in a close relationship, when Lance Armstrong won Tour de France the 7th time.
Lance Armstrong’s former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton noted that Lance Armstrong had administered prohibited medications. They also confirmed that the athlete had been the leader of a doping team. In addition to these affirmations, they confirmed that Armstrong’s apartment had been full of equipment used for administration of forbidden medications. These individuals were going to testify against the 7-time winner of tour de France. They confirmed that the cyclist had won Tour de France 7 times with the help of prohibited preparations.
As for Sheryl Crow, she didn’t appear in the court because the case against the sportsperson was dropped prior to the hearing.
While the government dropped the case, the USADA continued to pursue the former cyclist. As a result, Lance Armstrong forfeited his titles. He was also sentenced to life-time ban from professional sports. Fortunately, his charity against cancer was not destroyed. Sponsors continue to support Lance Armstrong and donate. Although his titles are forfeited, Lance Armstrong is appreciated because he helps numerous persons in their efforts against cancer.

Derek Jeter is accused of steroid use

The sports journalist Skip Bayless accuses the baseball player Derek Jeter of steroid use. He has pronounced his thoughts of criticism during the talk show “First take”.
Actually, the ESPN2 journalist doesn’t have any basis in order to suppose that Derek Jeter administers doping medications. Despites this fact, the statements of the ESPN2 journalist have been spread. Before accusing Derek Jeter of steroid use, the reporter began to criticize anti-doping system of the MLB. He claimed that the MLB’s tests for prohibited products are not sophisticated enough to detect those who apply forbidden medications.
Skip Bayless reminded Victor Conte’s opinion linked with testosterone:epitestosterone ratio test that is performed in the MLB. This method is not sophisticated enough to catch those that administer prohibited drugs. Instead of this method, it is needed to use another. Carbon isotope ratio is more sophisticated.
The ESPN2 journalist Skip Bayless also noted that the MLB didn’t have any testing for HGH. The test for this medication is performed in the MLB only once per year. But blood tests for this product should be performed more times during year. Under other circumstances, players may administer this medication and remain undetectable.
Thus, the ESPN2 journalist Skip Bayless believes that Derek Jeter applies HGH and other performance-enhancing drugs. The sports journalist also notes that if he were a baseball player, he would take HGH.
Thus, the ESPN2 journalist supposes that MLB players take HGH and probably other banned drugs without being detected by anti-doping officers.
It is quite evident that the steroid era in baseball is not over. Professional baseball players use different prohibited medicines and avoid detection. But nobody can accuse an athlete of doping, basing only on improper drug testing. It is necessary to focus on facts, accusing an athlete of application of banned medications. Otherwise, any suspicion doesn’t have any value.

Doping scandal linked with Melky Cabrera

It happens often that when athletes test positive for any forbidden medications, they try to prove that they have never applied any banned medicine intentionally. They find different ways to demonstrate that they are innocent. They do a lot in order to escape from bans and/or other sanctions. Here is a situation.
The baseball player Melky Cabrera tested positive for testosterone. Undoubtedly, he was sentenced to a 50-game suspension. Like other sportspeople he decided to find a way to prove his innocence and avoid the suspension.
Numerous doping sportspeople who are caught claim that they have administered a dietary supplement that resulted in positive for certain prohibited substance. However several athletes may have taken contaminated dietary supplements, a lot of sportspersons administer steroids and choose this way of defense because it works in many cases.
Thus, Melky Cabrera claimed that he had taken a dietary supplement which resulted in his positive for testosterone. In fact, it was a lie. Trying to avoid the 50-game suspension, he also created a web site and posted a fictitious supplement and advertisements which promoted selling it. The product didn’t exist in reality. It was just a hoax of Melky Cabrera and his associates in order to defend the professional baseball player.
Juan Nunez, a paid consultant for Athletes’ Career Enhanced and Secured Incorporated (ACES), was the person that created the site.
But the hoax turned out to be unsuccessful. The MLB could expose the baseball player and Juan Nunez. So, Melky Cabrera was enforced to serve the ban.
The ACES got troubles as well. Since Juan Nunez has been a consultant for ACES, the agency and Seth and Sam Levinson were accused of involving in the hoax. But these persons confirmed that they were not implicated in the creation of the site and the lie that was invented by Melky Cabrera and Juan Nunez. Juan Nunez also confirmed that Seth and Sam Levinson had nothing to do with this hoax.
The Food and Drug Administration is still investigating the case. It is unclear yet whether other individuals would be also prosecuted and sanctioned for the hoax.

Application of Primoteston Depot and Oxandrolone by prostitutes

Recently Australian Customs and Border Protection detained four individuals that possessed the anabolic steroids Oxandrolone (Anavar) and Primoteston Depot (testosterone). Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam wanted to smuggle these products to Bangladesh. The medications were seized and these persons were arrested.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper presented a report about this situation, claiming that 4 individuals were arrested while they wanted to smuggle steroids which were intended for intake by prostitutes in Bangladesh. This piece of news surprised a lot of persons. What does The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper mean? Do prostitutes administer the same products like sportspeople and bodybuilder that try to improve their performance, increasing muscle mass and strength? Why do prostitutes use anabolic steroids? Which is the purpose?
Some individuals understood that it was wrong to suppose that Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam desired to smuggle the steroids in order to inject prostitutes with them. Of course, prostitutes don’t use anabolic steroids. There is confusion here. Prostitutes take corticosteroids which differ from anabolic steroids wholly. Corticosteroids cause other effects. They can increase performance in prostitutes. While anabolic steroids help to gain muscle size and decrease fat deposits, corticosteroids induce wasting muscles and enhance body fat levels.
Orexadon is one of catabolic steroids used by prostitutes. Those who use this medication look healthier and more attractive. Thus, such prostitutes who administer this remedy have more clients.
A prostitute that applies Orexadon notices that she has ability to serve up to 15 clients per day.
Thus, it is possible to claim that prostitutes don’t administer anabolic steroids that are commonly advised for performance-enhancing effects in sports and bodybuilding. Corticosteroids are more appropriate medicines for them.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper presented a false report. Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam didn’t try to smuggle steroids for prostitutes in Bangladesh.

Guidelines linked with usage HCG and Clomid during/after steroid cycles

When you buy steroids for cycles, you should also get such products that must be applied to get recovery after administration of steroids.
In case a cycle with steroids lasts more than 8 weeks, HCG should be taken during the cycle. It is important to take into account that this preparation is administered only during steroid use.
There such drugs that should be used after steroid cycles. For example, Clomid should be taken after steroid cycles. It is needed to start administering this medicine after androgen levels fall significantly and recovery with this medication becomes possible. It is normally recommended to start taking Clomid with a high measure (300 mg/day) and decrease it gradually till 50 mg a day. Then decreased doses are taken until steroid users become convinced that natural secretion of testosterone is restored and testicles have returned to their ordinary size.
If Clomid is applied about 6 weeks and no improvement is seen, it is needed to interrupt administration of this drug. Then if improvements don’t occur, it is needed to continue taking Clomid till recovery is gotten. It is permitted to apply this drug a year. Several studies have manifested that prolonged usage of this drug doesn’t cause severe problems. However several persons may experience vision problems because of Clomid, these problems are not permanent. They disappear after discontinuation of usage. If any problems related to vision system occur in those that administer Clomid, they must discontinue taking this drug.
Clomid may be also used after steroid cycles. A typical dosage is 75 mg/day in such situations.
Although there are such preparations that help to get recovery after steroid use and store strength and muscle gains, it is not recommended to have long-term steroid cycles.

Usage of Clomid and Nolvadex during/after administration of steroids

Numerous individuals frequently ask which drug is more suitable for a PCT: Clomid or Nolvadex. While several consumers of steroids think that Clomid is better for this purpose, others claim that Nolvadex is more proper. Certain individuals notice that Clomid and Nolvadex should be combined.
When you examine structures of these preparations, you can see that they have similar structures. That’s why they have several similar features. But the most of persons and even scientists believe that Clomid and Nolvadex are wholly different medicines. Which basis does this affirmation have? These products are used in medicine for different purposes. Nolvadex is recommended for treatment of breast cancer in women. When it comes to Clomid, it is administered in case of infertility. That’s why it is believed that these are entirely different preparations.
In fact, they may be also administered for various purposes in bodybuilding and sports. Clomid is recommended in order to receive recovery after a steroid cycle during a PCT. As for Nolvadex, it is usually administered as an anti-estrogen product.
Comparing potency of these preparations, it is possible to see that Nolvadex is more potent anti-estrogen substance than Clomid.
Both Clomid and Nolvadex are able to reduce estrogen levels, stimulating hypothalamus to produce greater amounts of testosterone.
When it comes to doses of these drugs, they are different because one of them is more potent than another. Clomid should be used in more enhanced dosages. So, such quantities of Nolvadex, as 20-40 mg, produce more obvious effects than 100-150 mg of Clomid.
Nolvadex is not the most potent anti-estrogen. Such drugs, as Proviron, Arimidex and Viratase, are claimed to be more powerful but Nolvadex and Clomid work faster.
Sometimes Clomid or Nolvadex may be used together with Arimidex or Proviron during a steroid cycle. Such combinations are usually applied in case of abnormal development of breast tissues.
When you try to choose which product you should use: Nolvadex or Clomid, you should take into account some aspects.
Nolvadex has positive impact on cholesterol levels. It also has more direct influence on natural production of testosterone than Clomid. As it has been already mentioned, Nolvadex is more potent than Clomid. In addition to these advantages, Nolvadex is safer. Moreover, Nolvadex causes less serious unwanted results than Clomid because lower dosages are required to cause good results. Furthermore, while negative reactions of Clomid are permanent, those of Nolvadex disappear after discontinuation of application. The only priority of Clomid is following: it helps to maintain more potential gains than Nolvadex.
Knowing these differences between Nolvadex and Clomid, steroid users can make their choice properly.