Unusual reasons of bans

The National Football League sentenced to suspensions D. J. Williams, a linebacker, and defensive lineman Ryan McBean of the team Denver Broncos for violation of steroid policy. They were suspended from six games. But they were not suspended for application of steroids. They didn’t test positive for steroids or other forbidden drugs. They were accused in providing “non-human” urine samples to the drug testing officer.
D. J. William affirmed that he had never tested for any banned substance during eight years of his career. The football player noticed that he was proud of his records. The football player mentioned that he was also proud of his manner in that he conducted himself, being a sportsperson.
Peter Schaffer, the defensive attorney for McBean, affirmed that the NFL had violated rights of this player. He noticed that since McBean had never tested positive for any forbidden medicine, the NFL didn’t have any right to sentence him to suspension.
Peter Schaffer confirmed that he intended to make it clear that neither D. J. Williams, nor Ryan McBean tested positive for prohibited products.
A lawsuit was filed in Denver County Court against suspensions of these players of the NFL.
D. J. Williams and Ryan McBean affirmed that the drug testing officer had violated certain rules linked with the procedure of collecting urine samples.
Peter Schaffer noted that certain similarities had been between his client and Ryan Braun. Braun won his appeal related to his suspension from 50 games for usage of testosterone. Ryan Braun could prove that Dino Laurenzi, the drug testing officer, violated steroid policy.
As for Laurenzi, he was defended and supported by different anti-doping agencies. The WADA also supported him. It was confirmed that there was the same procedure of collecting and sending urine samples not only for the MLB but also for the WADA.
But as for the drug testing officer that collected samples of Williams and McBean, another attitude was displayed to him. He was fired by the NFL for wrong doing his duty.
At the hearing the NFL administrators admitted that the drug testing officer violated the chain of custody for urine samples.
Nonetheless, the appeal on behalf of the players was rejected.